To Skip Navigation Press Enter.Link to the Color Usage Site Home Page
Use the category links below to navigate this web site. All site pages can also be accessed with the site map.
Design Process Color Graphics Topics Color Guidelines Aerospace
Color Science Utilities Site Map
Link back to the CURL Home Page


On This Page:  • Viewing Geometry   • Color Losses due to Reflected Light
  • What to Do About Reflected Light 

Reflected light is one of the hardest problems to deal with in color graphics design. Light from the workspace is reflected in varying degrees from the front and interior surfaces of the display. This light "dilutes" the controlled light from the graphics, reducing luminance contrasts and color purities from the designed values. If the amount and location of the reflected light are particularly bad, the legibility, color discrimination, and sometimes even the detectability of the graphics can be reduced.

For most applications the reflected light in the users' display environments will differ from yours and from each other. This makes it very hard, often impossible, to design luminance contrasts that will look exactly the same on all users' displays as on the designer's.

So what can the designer do to ensure the usability of the design? The viewing environment is in the user's control rather than the designer's. We outline the physical problem, then discuss the designer's options.

Viewing Geometry Back to the top of the page.

There are two geometrical layouts to understand:
1) the geometry of the reflected light, i.e., the position and shape of the reflected light within the viewed graphics and
2) the geometrical layout of the viewing environment, i.e., where the light sources are with respect to the screen and the viewer.

Geometry of the reflected light. The reflected light interferes with perception of the graphics in two main ways, depending on the shape of the reflected light and where it is within the field of view.

Illustrates loss of contrast of symbols in a region of the display overlaid by a reflection of a bright object.

1) Large diffuse reflections. When the reflected light covers a large portion of the field of view its primary interference is through reduction of the contrasts of the graphical symbols. This can happen in several viewing geometries (see below).
Illustrates a legible reflection of an exit sign on the display.
2) Localized, patterned reflections. In this case the light forms a visible shape superimposed on the graphics which interferes with perception of the graphics in several ways. If the pattern is bright and fairly sharp it can interfere with perception and recognition of the symbols through pattern masking. It can also interfere by distracting the user's attention, especially if the reflected light is moving. This type of reflection is usually the result of specular reflection (see below).


Geometry of the viewing environment. Which light sources will be reflected on the viewer's screen depends on the layout of the viewing environment. The basic geometry is the same throughout, but the result is different for the two main types of reflection, diffuse and specular.

Illustrates light reflected  to the user.
The main geometric rule is that the angle of reflection equals the angle of incidence. Since we are concerned only with the light that is reflected into the viewer's eyes, the most important light sources are those that lie at the end of sight lines from the eye to the screen and back at equal angles (except for glare--see below). For diffuse reflections there is significant reflection at other angles as well.
The scattering of light from a perfectly diffuse reflector to the viewer's eye.
For a perfect diffusing surface light is scattered in all directions in proportion to the cosine of the angle of incidence of the illumination.
Diffuse light gets visually superimposed on the display graphics from bright light sources beside the screen, but within the visual field.
Glare. A second way that diffuse light gets visually superimposed on the display graphics is from bright light sources beside the screen, but within the visual field . This "glare" light is not reflected from the screen but instead is spread over the retina by scattering within the clear media of the eye and by transmission through the white translucent wall of the eye (the sclera).

Reduced Luminance Contrast and Color Purity due to Reflected Light Back to the top of the page.

Here is an example of how light reflected from the display surface reduces the luminance contrast of the graphics:

Let's begin with a display in a dark room, with a "white" background of 100 nits and consider a symbol with a luminance of 10 nits. The Michelson contrast of the symbol is Lm = (100 - 10) / (100+ 10) = 81.8%. Now we turn on the room lights and there is a reflection of my white t-shirt on top of the symbol and its immediate surround. If the reflection is 10 nits of additional light on both symbol and surround, then the Michelson contrast is now Lm = (110 - 20) / (110+ 20) = 69.2%.

If sunlight falls directly on the surface of a display, the diffuse reflection can be much worse. In a recent measurement, an actual cockpit LCD display was illuminated by a sunlamp simulating direct sunlight through a cockpit window. Without the sunlamp the white and black luminances were 260.7 nits and 12.6 nits, respectively, giving Lm = (260.7 - 12.6) / (260.7+ 12.6) = 90.8% for black symbols on white background. With the sunlamp on the white and black luminances were 329 nits and 80.9 nits, respectively, giving Lm = (329 - 80.9) / (329 + 80.9) = 60.5%.

The effects on color purity can also be substantial. The reflected light in the simulation was white, and when it is added to the chromatic lights on the display, it dilutes them. The red primary of the display, for example, has CIE x and y of 0.605 and 0.341, respectively, without the sunlamp. With the sunlamp on x = 0.411 and y = 0.326, significantly closer to the color of the white background. Excitation purity was reduced from about 78% to about 22%. With the sunlamp on the "red" primary appeared barely colored. Under these conditions discrimination of color labels could become unreliable. The problems might be much worse: CRT displays often have much higher reflectances than this specialized LCD.

There is some evidence, however, that visual adaptation can reduce the impact of this kind of general loss of color purity on color recognition Post & Calhoun. When all of the colors in a laboratory visual scene were diluted by reflected light the color names given to colors that were good examples under more favorable conditions (e.g., in the center of the chromaticity region called "red") were little affected. While this is somewhat reassuring, the laboratory conditions that allowed this good recognition performance may not be comparable to some common real work environments. Users often scan back and forth among displays and printed materials under different illumination conditions.
More about visual adaptation.


What the Designer Can Do About Reflected Light Back to the top of the page.

Ideally the graphics will be used on appropriate physical displays in well-designed, predictable viewing circumstances. Under these conditions the designer can measure the expected reflected light and take it into account in designing the luminance contrasts of the graphic elements. However, even under these ideal conditions, if the luminance range of the users' reflected lights is too great the intended perceptual salience hierarchy will be difficult to maintain. If there are high luminance reflections the luminance contrast of the least important data must be increased above that for normal viewing conditions if they are to remain visible. Then the same graphics may be too salient when there are lower luminance reflections, distracting attention from the more important data.

The best solution is to reduce and stabilize the reflected light by changes in the viewing environment, use of anti-reflection displays, or both. If the viewing geometry can't be controlled in that way, it may be necessary to provide for the users to control the overall luminance contrast of their display. This gives the user control over the salience hierarchy, a two-edged sword. For a user who thoroughly understands how to maintain the salience hierarchy this is ideal. For less aware users it introduces an opportunity for lost information and error hazards. We have observed one applied setting in which the operators were allowed to adjust the luminance contrast of map and other context information separately from the contrast of target symbols and labels. While most operators turned the context information down to barely-visible levels, others turned it to undetectable levels. Should they need the context information (and realize that they needed it) they would be required to turn it back up.


Related Topics:
go to this page
Display Hardware and Software
go to this page Creating Perceptual Hierarchies
go to this page Designing with Luminance Contrast

About This Site

| Design Process | Color Graphics Topics | Color Tool | Guidelines | Aerospace | Color Science | Utilities

  Site Curator: Richard Mogford | Responsible NASA Official: Richard Mogford | Privacy Statement

NASA Logo     Ames Research Center Logo     Human Systems Integration Division Logo